Alice Sperling and Pam Folts lead a workshop on consensus decision making. Consensus is defined as “A state of mutual agreement among members of a group where all legitimate concerns of individuals have been addressed to the satisfaction of the group.” Consensus is not defined as everyone agreeing with each other. Benefits and downsides of consensus were discussed, as well as the importance of a facilitator and scribe (who are not the coordinator or chair of the group). The motto was Don’t Assume!! CLARIFY and RECORD. Some ideas for consensus language included phrases like: -one possible action…. –a possible modification is….. -I recommend… -it seems to me… -I propose… -I affirm… -I can (or can’t) support… -I would like to suggest…
Consensus ground rules: -Set time limit -ensure full participation -listen with an open mind when not speaking -own the process -creative solutions can come out of conflict -must have a recorder
Consensus process summarized: -State concerns and brainstorm -first call for consensus -resolve concerns -second call for consensus
Even if all matters are not resolved, the process can: -crystallize the discussion -clarify the underlying issue -identify options for handling disagreements -build respect and understanding among participants.