October 3, 2001
Announcements:
There were few announcements. The water levels in the Marys River are lower than normal. They are approaching the 25th percentile. The water is cold, at least near Wren.
Committee Reports:
Steering:
Chuck Lane has agreed to continue serving as chair
Amy Schoener has agreed to continue serving as vice chair
Hugh Snook, while not present at the meeting, had previously indicated that
he would be willing to serve as scribe.
Dave Hana and Lance Campbell have agreed to serve together as primary
facilitator and alternate facilitator respectively.
We do not have anyone who has agreed to serve as treasurer.
Water Quality Monitoring:
Land and Water Use:
Culvert:
Education and Outreach:
Speaker: Maria Panfil of CWESt
There has been a United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) / Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) joint request for proposals (RFP). The request asks for research at a watershed scale to examine the transport and fate of nutrients, specifically nitrogen and phosphorus. A group of people has been meeting to develop a proposal to use the Oak Creek Basin as a study area. The area is mostly owned by one landowner (Oregon State University) and, while small, has forest, agriculture, rural residential, and urban landscapes represented in the basin. The project team is seeking support from community members, and Maria requested that the MRWC write and submit a letter in support of the research proposal.
A concern was raised that this seems like a top-down approach where a federal agency says that "this is the research you will do," rather than a group of scientists just researching what they think is important. Another concern was raised that the research might lead to changes water quality standards that some participants might not want to see. There was further concern that there would be requirements to improve the water quality in Oak Creek if the study showed that the water quality was less than desired.
Most of the concerns were discussed, and it was agreed that a letter of interest would be drafted rather than a letter of support. Once there is more specific information in the proposal, the MRWC could decide to support it. The letter of interest would indicate that the study includes nutrient monitoring, which is something the MRWC is already doing, and that there may be a benefit to the council of having additional data. The letter will be e-mailed to members for comments. The Steering Committee will review the letter and may approve it at their next meeting. All who are interested are encouraged to participate in this and any Steering Committee meeting.